C-SUITE SECRETS | Turbulence at Lufthansa Technik PH, Part 2 of 3
Why the Germans said no?
Yesterday, we wrote about the lease dispute that reportedly strained relations between the German and Philippine partners of Lufthansa Technik Philippines (LTP).
According to multiple sources, that disagreement did not remain in the boardroom. It soon found its way onto the hangar floor.

LTP’s line maintenance operations have since been dissolved, with hundreds of highly trained Filipino aircraft mechanics expected to leave the company by July 31.
Many possess certifications that make them attractive to airlines across the world. Several are reportedly headed to PAL Express, while others are considering opportunities overseas where Lufthansa Technik training commands a premium.
Publicly, LTP has said it is expanding to Clark. But industry insiders describe the situation somewhat differently.
According to sources familiar with the transition, Clark will eventually house the company’s heavy base maintenance operations, while line maintenance responsibilities are being transferred elsewhere.
Then came an unexpected complication. The June 8 earthquake in Mindanao reportedly disrupted operations in General Santos, slowing preparations for the transition. At the same time, the Philippine side still needed additional time to complete licensing and certification requirements for personnel who would assume the work previously handled by LTP’s line maintenance unit.
THEPHILBIZNEWS sources say an extension was requested. But it was declined. Why?
One explanation is logistical: By then, hundreds of employees had already been informed of their separation, while exit clearances and documentation were already underway.
Reversing course would have been extremely difficult.
Another explanation is relational: Several sources say the German side felt it had already made enough concessions during the earlier lease negotiations and saw little reason to extend another accommodation.
Whether that assessment is fair depends on whom one asks. What appears less disputed is that the trust between the partners had already been weakened.
Industry sources stress that aviation safety itself should not be compromised. Aircraft cannot legally operate without appropriately licensed personnel performing the required maintenance.
If the people are not yet ready, the aircraft stay on the ground. That protects passengers. But it also carries a heavy financial cost.
The broader question, however, is no longer about one company. It is about the environment in which major foreign investors operate.
Part 3 of 3: Where was government?

No comments: